The Fractal Hall Journal

October 24th, 2008

Daredevil, Delineated

Posted by Madeley in Comics, Crime

Frank Miller’s Daredevil run is a classic work, defining the character so well that creators still follow his lead almost 30 years after his debut on the title. This isn’t a bad thing, at all, because Miller crafted one of the most efficient storytelling engines ever with his take on Matt Murdock. Daredevil as initially conceived had some great hooks; a blind lawyer with every other sense enhanced, with the background of a street fighter and the skill of an acrobat. But the character was unfairly considered a Spider-Man take off, and never made the A-list until Miller. As I mentioned earlier this week, it wouldn’t be that difficult to define the character differently pre- and post-1980.

Core genre: Now this is interesting, because here we see a way to reconcile both eras, in a way. Miller places the character very clearly within “crime”. That’s where his interest was, that’s the direction he wanted to take the character in. It’s probably fair to say he was more interested in the Kingpin and his henchfolks that in Murdock. The earlier Daredevil was more of a swashbuckler and adventurer. And as with Green Arrow, it’s easy to see the overlap between pulp-adventurers and noir-type crime stories. I think Daredevil lies somewhere within that overlap.

A) A blind man with super-senses
B) Radar sense
C) The skills of a street brawler and an acrobat
D) A devil costume
E) Lawyer alter-ego.
F) A contradictory inner-conflict

It’s a fairly long list of factors, all essential. It’s a testament both to his creators and to Miller that Daredevil’s engineering is so simple, obvious and elegant, yet is the foundation of so much conflict and complexity.

I’ll get the psychology out of the way first. This is maybe Miller’s most important addition, a recognition of contradiction in a Catholic who dresses as a devil while engaged in good works. He’s a blind man who’s more aware than any around him, a wealthy man in a white-collar job with working class origins in a dangerous neighbourhood, a lawyer who breaks the law every single night.

From a pulp-adventurer standpoint, it doesn’t matter that Daredevil hasn’t got particularly supervillainy bad guys. A largely faceless set of common crooks, organised criminals and ninjas are in keeping with a protagonist who needs a lot of cannon-fodder to prove his mettle. Personally, I’m not keep on Daredevil’s ninja stuff, but it’s in keeping with his genre. I suppose the reason I question it is that I prefer Daredevil to be more of a brawling street fighter than a Batman-type martial artist, Murdock being the son of his father, a working class boxer. And I think Daredevil would be comfortable with playing dirty if he had to. Again, we see another contrast within the character: a graceful acrobat but a brutal fighter.

Because of his enhanced senses, he’s one of the characters who can locate and contextualise his villains most easily. One perspective the film took that I thought was quite interesting was the way he fought one battle in the courtroom every day, and continued it at night if justice wasn’t done. Of course, he’s not really meant to be a prosecutor, so it doesn’t quite work as a status quo, but it’s an interesting take. It’s better in the comics, I think, because as a defender, it gives him the chance to rehabilitate these villains, to mitigate their circumstances. There’s the good works again, and yet another contradiction: the very same man who hunts and maims them so brutally is responsible for dusting them off the next day. His day job becomes essental as a way of placing his villains, of understanding his villains, in a context beyond the hunt/fight/tie them up for the police pattern of most heroes.

The radar sense is an important element, mostly because it’s really cool. Seriously, it’s one of the all-time great powers. I can see why it’s sometimes played down, in particular when writers want to make him more of a skilled ninja who senses his environment via sound and the movement of air (see Miller and JR Jr’s Man Without Fear miniseries), but I think it serves a good purpose as part of Murdock’s power set and his story themes. It means he sees nothing, and everything.

Addendum: After writing the above, plok mentioned a few things in regard to Daredevil in the comments of another post. There are a few things in there that made me think (and if you’ve been following these delineation posts without taking a look at the comments, you’re missing some excellent points and counter-points from plok, Will and Will). One thing that is obvious is that this post has been almost entirely about post-Miller DD, unavoidable generally because his take has become the dominant one, and specifically because I haven’t read that much of the 70s Daredevil. That’s something I need to remedy, and I suspect will lead to a post in the near future that addresses this.

1) “The very most topmost important thing about DD is that he’s blind.” Absolutely. Not least because it drains colour from Murdock’s viewpoint, setting up yet another contrast. The Marvel U is a colourful world, even in the noir-corner Daredevil inhabits. The use of colour (red in particular, of course) is very important in Miller’s run, and even in the blurry murk of the Bendis/Maleev stories (I really need to start introducing examples to back some of this up. Bear with me, these follow-ups are coming). But colour, and light, are things Murdock hasn’t seen since he was a child.

2) “I maintain the difference between him and Batman is… he enjoys his crimefighting life.” I haven’t touched on this, but I certainly should underline that just because I think Matt Murdock is contradictory and conflicted, it doesn’t mean I think he has to be particularly grim. To play him straight down the line miserable is a mistake, I think, and something that takes subtlety from the character. I think it’s interesting that even though he gets shat on more than almost any other hero, the writers still aren’t able to go all the way and portray him as bloody and merciless. He isn’t, after all, the Punisher.

3) “DD isn’t driven (he caught his Joe Chill in issue #1).” Which ties in to the above. If he’s at all compelled in his adventuring, it’s because he loves to do it. This character loves conflict, thrives on it. He has to, considering what the writers usually inflict on him. Murdock takes pleasure in these contradictions.

Lawyer and criminal, hunter and defender, grinning adventurer and tortured Catholic. Matt Murdock and Daredevil.

Click here for the Delineation Archive.

     Feed
Tags: , , , , , .

5 Responses to ' Daredevil, Delineated '

Subscribe to Comments for The Fractal Hall Journal or TrackBack to ' Daredevil, Delineated '.


  1. on October 24th, 2008 at 3:33 am

    “1) “The very most topmost important thing about DD is that he’s blind.” Absolutely. Not least because it drains colour from Murdock’s viewpoint, setting up yet another contrast. The Marvel U is a colourful world, even in the noir-corner Daredevil inhabits. The use of colour (red in particular, of course) is very important in Miller’s run, and even in the blurry murk of the Bendis/Maleev stories (I really need to start introducing examples to back some of this up. Bear with me, these follow-ups are coming). But colour, and light, are things Murdock hasn’t seen since he was a child.”

    I’m not actually sure about this. Isn’t the topmost important thing about DD that he dons a costume and fights crime (which is the reason you can delineate him)? I get that blindness is sort of a part of his mythos, but then again, it’s nearly superfluous because of his radar sense (and yes, I know the latter is a result of the former [or, rather, the latter is a trade of the former]). You make the point of the way Miller uses red (with which I am admittedly unfamiliar), but really I like that you note the most important thing of all: Murdock can’t see, and in fact hasn’t seen, anything like light or colour in years. It’s a great point.

    I’ve always liked Daredevil, actually, but I’m not sure I previously realized the study in dichotomies he actually is.

  2. plok said,

    on October 24th, 2008 at 11:27 am

    He always was; Miller just found a new way to expose it. Previous to his run, it came out in many ways, but one of the most important (if you ask me) was that DD always had the most fraught secret-identity shtick of possibly any superhero at any time. His secret ID caused constant problems for him, starting with the way he had to remember (practically in every panel!) to conceal the nature of his perceptions — one way as Matt Murdock, and the opposite way as Daredevil. This was always the tension: at any moment, DD might slip and reveal his blindness; at any moment, Matt might slip and reveal his radar sense.

    One of my favourite DD stories was the one where he took a gangster as a client in a murder case, because the gangster said he hadn’t killed the victim, and by listening to his heartbeat Matt could tell he wasn’t lying. And being the good prop of the system that he is (was), he decides that even gangsters shouldn’t be falsely convicted. So he gets the guy off, but then — SPOILERS — discovers he did kill the victim, but Matt didn’t know because the guy also has a heart condition, and wears a pacemaker. Zut alors! Talk about the problem of locating and contextualizing…

    The ninja stuff, by contrast, I never really liked.

    So I think you forgot “Procedural Drama” in there.

    But it’s interesting, isn’t it, that Bendis’ first act was to expose the double identity? Showing that, even if only semi-consciously, he really does have an excellent grasp of the fundamentals — of course I don’t care for what he eventually did with it. Really, if anyone ever finds out Daredevil is blind, he’s done for: as a secret, his condition is often an advantage, but as common knowledge it would be really easy to use it against him…and, memory sparks, there was a What If issue all about that, which I remember quite liking. Anyway, this consequence of revealing the secret somehow never comes up, which I think was an oversight — instead we have that whole “he broke the law” thing, another kind of dichotomous conflict but I think just slightly the wrong kind. But oh well, who’s asking me?

    It may be important to note, though, that the pre-Miller DD had lots and lots of super-villains, many of them sporting a single, bizarre physical augmentation…Stilt-Man, Leapfrog, the Ox…even the Kingpin fits into this scheme, with his “super-fatness”.

    Ha, “super-fatness”…comics are great…

    Not that I’m complaining about Miller’s run, which I loved then and still love now. There’s no doubt he understood what made the character tick, and he was pretty innovative in how he chose to show it off. I mentioned the minor similarities between Miller’s DD and McGregor’s Black Panther, and I think if that was deliberate it was also a choice that made a certain amount of sense: DD and the Black Panther were a bit of a matched pair for a while, good mirror-images.

    But I miss the old DD, now.

  3. will shetterly said,

    on October 24th, 2008 at 11:05 pm

    I’ve been thinking a little more about genres. I was reminded that two of the earliest comics were Action Comics and Detective Comics, so I really like those names for the categories just now.

    But detectives have traditionally fallen into two camps, the thinker and the hunter, Sherlock Holmes and Sam Spade. Batman should be Holmes. Daredevil should be Spade.

    And one point I would stress: you need the “dare” in the “devil.” That’s part of the reason for the flashy costume, and maybe why it looks like the devil. Daredevil’s not Batman, trying to scare people. He’s daring the devil to stop him.

  4. plok said,

    on October 26th, 2008 at 2:26 pm

    Try “Hawkeye”…I dare you.

    But if you only know Hawkeye through Bendis..,

    I’ll do ‘im.

  5. Madeley said,

    on October 26th, 2008 at 6:39 pm

    To be honest, plok, I only really know Hawkeye through his run on Thunderbolts, of all titles. Having never been an Avengers reader, I’m afraid he’s outside of my knowledge base. By all means, and this goes out to everybody, have a crack at this kind of thing yourself. I’d be interested to read what other people’s views are on what makes these characters tick, in particular if you disagree with some of the things I’ve been banging on about.

Leave a reply