The Fractal Hall Journal

March 19th, 2009

I Can’t Believe I’ve Never Embedded Before

Posted by Madeley in Politics, TV

     Feed
Tags: , .

March 18th, 2009

Back in Black

Posted by Madeley in Film, Fractal Business, Music, Politics, SF

And then the Funvee gets blown up.

The economy may be collapsing, climate change accelerating, and Cthulhu may be turning up soon to eat everyone’s heads, but none of that matters because, with a big old load of cockrock, the Journal lurches back into existence. I’ll skip the deadly sin of blogging-about-blogging; needless to say, I haven’t been around for a bit, but now I am. Probably weekly from now on.

A couple of things of note:

Council leaders have compiled a banned list of the 200 worst uses of jargon, proving once again that people have too much time on their hands, despite the best efforts of Twitter, Facebook, and people who play with their toys on the internet. While there’s a lot of management bollocks on there, I’m not sure we should start banning various terms because people are too fick to know what words mean. Councils in Scotland are going to have a bastard of a time instructing lawyers if they can’t use “Advocate”, for a start.

Also, by implication the following unlisted phrases must be perfectly acceptable for everyday use in Local Government: “Willy-wobbling”. “Turdfaced fuckwit”. “Felch”.

2009 film previews: Only one thing could top not only a new Trek film, but also the Transformers sequel. And that’s THIS:

SO RIGHTEOUS.

     Feed
Tags: , , , .

January 21st, 2009

And A Fine Tradition It Is Too

Posted by Madeley in Politics

Nothing for you good folks today, except this: I hope President Obama follows in the footsteps of his illustrious predecessors Josiah Bartlett and Matthew Santos.

     Feed
Tags: .

January 20th, 2009

A Day Of Some Significance

Posted by Madeley in Media, Politics

All I’m saying is that my primary feeling today isn’t so much one of hope, as of relief. And I don’t care what side of politics you come down on, the man on his way out was a fucking baboon.

More on this over at the Toybox.

On a similar note, via Aint It Cool (I know, I know), the CBC are planning a reality show where former Prime Ministers judge individuals on whether they’d make good PMs. While I was hoping to rib chum Plok about this, it turns out the Beeb has already bought the remake rights off of them. Oh dear. I am half hoping S4C will nick the idea for the Assembly, but we’re not that far away from Rhodri’s retirement; it’s quite possible someone will take this seriously and the next First Minister will get in on a phone vote.

I assume this is one of those let’s-get-The-Kids-into-politics things, ignoring the fact that The Kids are busy wearing hoodies and knifing grannies for their iPhones. Or something. I lose track.

     Feed
Tags: , , .

November 5th, 2008

Talk About Fireworks

Posted by Madeley in Politics

Barack Obama has been elected the first black president of the United States.

The 21st Century: Finally looking like the fucking future.

What’s next?

     Feed
Tags: .

September 18th, 2008

A Surprisingly Toothy Table

Posted by Madeley in Books, Film, Music, Politics, SF

Sweet Lord Cthulhu on a landspeeder, isn’t the American election over yet? I am so very, very sick of reading about that doddering old bastard and that loon he’s got running with him. Well, let’s face it, it’s that loon that most people seem to be writing about, and I’ve reached a saturation point where I no longer care. Am I not concerned with matters of global political significance? Of course I am. That’s why I just want them to hurry up and get on with whatever it is they need to get on with so we can all return our focus to impending economic catastrophe and building nuclear bunkers in our gardens. Because “Jabbing Russia With A Pokey Stick” had become a popular past-time of late and that has always turned out so well before.

I don’t know, it’s always easy to roll your eyes at how fucking bugnuts the world is, because you don’t have to look too far to find the crazy at any given point in history. But the whole creationism thing has really been eating at me recently. You kind of expect it of our fellows across the Atlantic (and I don’t mean to have a mean old jab or anything, but it does seem to come up a lot over there), but I get really itchy when it crops up in British newspapers as a thing. I mean, we all know it’s crazy? Don’t we? It’s just a stupid thing the media wants to make a drama of, right?

Then again, the politicians have recently started taking pot shots at women’s reproductive rights, and I thought that particular battle had been won a long time ago (ho, ho). It just doesn’t take much effort for matters to regress.

How depressing. Let’s have some links.

A three-year Southampton University study into the “out-of-body experience” phenomenon has kicked off. Because we are all cursed to never learn from the mistakes of Kiefer Sutherland in Flatliners.

Alien tat of the day: Almost five hundred quid’s worth of coffee table. If I could, I would buy all of the outrageously priced Alien and Predator junk I could get my hands on, and keep it all in one room tastefully decorated by Giger himself.

Irish novelist Eoin Colfer has been hired to write a sixth Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy novel. Now, this is an interesting story. Not surprising, because Douglas Adams’ books have always been incredibly popular, and who wants the gravy train to stop just because the author’s dead? I’m sure plenty of fanboys are screaming bloody murder.

But. I always felt the fifth Hitchhiker’s was awful, and a terrible way to end the series. And Adams always said he intended to do a sixth. I’m not what you’d call a dedicated fan of his, which makes it easier for me not to mind so much, I suppose. And I’ve never read any of Colfer’s work, but he really is phenomenally popular so he must have something going for him. I just really want a better ending than Mostly Harmless. Seriously, it was such a downer it really spoiled my enjoyment of the earlier books. So I’m certainly picking this one when it comes out.

And finally, a few bits of sad news from the music industry; the deaths of Pink Floyd’s Richard Wright and Motown’s Norman Whitfield. I’ve mentioned before that I’ve been getting my prog on recently, and probably appreciating the Floyd more than I have in the past. And Whitfield, christ, just look at a list of songs he co-wrote. Those are some of the greatest records ever made. And he was right. War is good for absolutely nothing.

     Feed
Tags: , , , , , , , .

May 26th, 2008

Whitewash

Posted by Madeley in Comics, Film, Games, Politics

The rest of this week’s posts will be a little different to usual, but before we get to them there’s something I wanted to mention here.

I don’t write about politics much on the Journal. The count in the column over there on the right tells me there’s 12 posts tagged under that heading, but even then they’re only broadly political and not really about any particular incident or headline. And that’s a deliberate decision on my part. Out in Meat Space you can’t shut me up about politics, certainly not after a couple of beers.

That’s reason one. I know what I get like. If the new Batman cartoon gets me all frothy about the brain, imagine what important things do to me. The Journal is meant to be an enjoyable diversion, for both myself and for you good folks out there. Losing my shit about the latest fuck-knows-what every single day would get pretty depressing pretty fast.

Reason two is that I’m acutely aware that not everything that makes it to your screens is the most thought-out, carefully-worded and insightful passage in the history of the language. Shocking, I know. Now, if I occasionally write something batshit crazy at four in the morning about toy robots, its actual influence on the rest of my life is negligable to say the least. For the moment, let’s put aside the ever-increasing likelihood of a hypothetical potential future employer googling me and then deciding that maybe the guy who gets all het up about the fate of the Tyrannosaur in Jurassic Park III isn’t the competent team-player they’re looking for. An ill-thought-out screed that you don’t really mean about a hot-button political issue, on the other hand, has the potential to seriously screw up your life. And I don’t need that pressure at four in the morning.

Does that mean I don’t think it’s important to have political views? Or to engage in political debate? Of course not. I don’t think a lot of the debate that happens online is always particularly useful, but that doesn’t mean it’s always unimportant. I just don’t really think that’s what the Journal’s for, and believe me if I thought there was something important that I just couldn’t shut up about, I’d bring it up.

Two things have seriously pissed me off recently. I’m not sure I’m able to articulate appropriately why they irritated me so much, but I don’t really want to let them slide without a remark.

The first I found out about via two posts by David Brothers over at 4thletter!, and was also covered in a post by Jonathan Bernhardt at Funnybook Babylon. I have nothing to add but a deep-felt conviction that there are times when the sheer fucking ignorance of my fellow human beings makes me long for the day when the Martians turn up and blow us all the fuck away.

And then the second was the recent rumour that Jake Gyllenhaal will soon be playing the Prince of Persia.

Wow. What great casting.

Perhaps they can black him up for the role. Perhaps he can put on a comedy Asian accent. Perhaps the production company is anticipating that there will be no kind of outcry from the country currently occupying the bit of the world historically known as Persia because they never ever fall out with the Americans, do they?

This is fucking insane. Who thinks this is a good idea? Does anyone not realise that a clue to the ethnicity of the main character is right there in the pissing title?

Bring on the Martian death rays, I say.

     Feed
Tags: , , , .

May 2nd, 2008

I’m Not Joking About The Pony

Posted by Madeley in Comics, Politics, Wales

Blue Beetle #26 is out this week. I haven’t read it yet, but I’m looking forward to it, even if it’s a fill-in issue. Because it’s written in Spanish, with an English translation in the back. I don’t have the first clue about the language, I just think it’s a neat experiment. I find differences in language and culture absolutely fascinating, to be right at the heart of human experience.

Of course, I’ve already seen some annoyance about this on-line (annoyance? On the internet? Incredible, I know), that maybe people won’t like the hassle of flipping to the translation. I don’t get this. I just don’t get why people don’t find something like this fun, or at least interesting.

But that’s what humans are like, I suppose. We’re not mad keen on something that’s different. And languages, boy, as a bilingual Welsh speaker I can tell you some stories about the animosity that languages, that translations of languages cause. We’re a funny old people sometimes, the Welsh.

I’m not keen on generalisations (he says immediately before launching into an analysis based on generalisation). I think it’s foolish to characterise an individual’s behaviours, quirks and tendencies based solely on what we consider to be the stereotypical attributes of their nationality. That said, of course there are certain factors that effect certain groupings of the human populations that don’t effect others, even down to simple geography, and I wonder if this doesn’t produce a variety of behaviours that can be identified in a proportion of that population.

I’ve heard the Welsh people characterised as tribal, overly-sensitive, contradictory, hot-headed, fiercely patriotic, warm-hearted, and insecure. Oh, and really enjoying singing. And it’s easy, if you’re Welsh, to play up to the stereotypes. The good ones, obviously (who doesn’t want to be proud of their nation? Who thinks musical skill of any kind is a bad thing?), although there’s still a motivation to play down to the bad ones too, if only as a way of raising the metaphorical flag and emphasising your identity.

The “tribal” thing is interesting. Warren Ellis in Crecy brings up belligerent tribalism as being particularly Welsh. The thing is, whether it’s political parties, football teams or Marvel and DC, human beings tend towards belligerent tribalism, presumably a evolutionary advantageous trait back in the day (though I’d suggest that our reasoning nature should tells us that overcoming this tribalism is a better trait in modern society). So why does it follow the Welsh around?

Two reasons, I think. Firstly, the notion of the “tribe” suggests a primitive, backwards people, an insulting undertone the “sophisticated” can aim at the lower classes or country folk, two groups that make up a sizable chunk of the Welsh population. Secondly, it’s not necessarily an insult: the concept of a tribe or clan ties in to a Welsh tradition of close families and tight-knit communities (and no sniggering at the back, I know what you’re thinking), to notions of national pride and connection to a Celtic past as part of the Welsh identity. So the “tribal” description, while far from uniquely Welsh, is perpetuated not only by people wishing to insult us.

A short way of putting it is that we do it to ourselves. The cultural (and political) damage that the Welsh have done (and continue to do) to their own nation ultimately outweighs damage done by external factors. We are the ones who don’t vote for independence, who choose devolution only reluctantly, who tie our fortunes to how well our team does in the national sport. And that ties into one of the above characteristics, one I find particularly pronounced in our culture: contradiction.

I’ve had more than one conversation with various friends about our own conflicting views on national identity. There are days when I love my country as blindly as any patriot, and days where I am sick to death of every last Welsh person on the planet. We irritate quickly if identified as belonging to another British country, if we aren’t given our Celtic due, and at exactly the same time the majority of us are terrified at the idea of seperating from Britain. So many contradictions.

But again, these things are not really different to the issues of every single other human being, regardless of race, nation or identity. The reason I flag it is because I believe that certain social factors occur within Wales that exacerbate this, well-worn channels dilligently carved out over the centuries that ensure our insecurities flow in the same stereotypical ways.

Sensitive, insecure, hot-headed, tribal; why do we expect to be any different? We’re a nation with its own cultural identity, its own flag, its own anthem, its own language, yet we aren’t politically a country on our own. We routinely refer to ourselves as being “Welsh”, even though it’s a derivation of an old German word for “foreigner”. How many other people refer to themselves as foreigners in their own country? (Well, Wallachians for a start. Same root meaning.) We’re heavily industrialised, and at the same time mostly rural. Our heavy industry has gone away to be replaced by nothing, while we seem unable to capitalise on our agricultural history as our farming tradition is slowly being lost, even in the face of a global food crisis. There are no efficient transport links between the North of the country and the South, and there is still, if not outright animosity, then mutual ambivalence between the two. We are very much a divided people, just not necessarily in the obvious usual ways.

Which brings me back to the language. Holy shit, does that polarise people. I know it’s cowardly and achieves nothing, but I’m so fed up with the fucking endless round-the-houses on the issue that I don’t engage in any conversation that goes near the subject any more. There is so much defensiveness, misunderstanding and anger that I don’t believe I’ll ever be able to have a sensible conversation without someone fucking losing it. You know what really gets up people’s noses? Road signs. Fucking road signs. People come into the country and whinge because the signs are bilingual, people in the country whinge that they can’t understand the signs, that they’re being discriminated against because there’s Welsh on the signs, that adding Welsh place-names on signs is prohibitively expensive and for fuck’s sake people, they’re road signs, this issue shouldn’t paralyse sensible debate about the future of the pissing nation.

You see what happened there? I got defensive and angry. Even I’m able to spot the craziness of that. So believe me, I understand very well issues that surround culture and language, about how they complicate issues of identity. I just wish that these differences didn’t cause the animosity they do.

And while I’m wishing, I’d like a fucking pretty fairy pony too.

     Feed
Tags: , , .

February 19th, 2008

Double Bill

Posted by Madeley in Film, Horror, Politics, SF, TV

Do you know how close the Journal is to becoming a site devoted to cat pictures? This close. You can’t see me right now but I’m holding my right thumb and forefinger really close together. And I’ll be doing so all day for the benefit of those in different time zones.

Fractal Films

Cloverfield (2008)

I couldn’t possibly do better than this here Cloverfield summary.

A thoroughly good giant monster flick with a nice little hand-held camera gimmick, it hit every mark it needed to by doing exactly what it says on the tin. I don’t know why so many people seem to find it disappointing, as I’m not quite sure what else you could demand from a film about a big creature eating people and buildings. It hardly uneventful, and the dialogue was as witty as you’d expect from a guy who used to write for Buffy the Vampire Slayer (cf. AVPR, a movie written so badly the abbreviated title sounds like a tax form). Possibly the viral marketing left too much room for speculation; I remember getting a little overexcited myself when I thought it might have been a Cthulhu Mythos thing.

Interesting to see that a number of reviews mention how much the reviewer loathes people talking loudly in the cinema. Now, this seems to come up a lot, in particular when people talk about why they don’t want to go to the cinema anymore, or why ticket sales are in decline. My question is, is this specifically an American behaviour, or does it happen on this side of the Pond too and I’m oblivious? I honestly don’t remember the last time I got annoyed by someone talking during a film. So either I’m just not noticing it, it isn’t really a problem in South Wales, or (entirely possible) I’m the annoying one doing all the talking.

Charlie Wilson’s War (2007)

Aaron Sorkin’s West Wing is just about the greatest thing that’s ever been on television. I even really like the series after his departure, on the grounds that sub-par West Wing is still way smarter than most things that get turded through the airwaves. But as much as I enjoyed Studio 60, this is the first work he’s done for a number of years that’s come close to the former show. It manages to be tragic, moving, hilarious, with a particularly scathing irony aimed at US political maneuvering in light of the eventual result of arming the Afghan resistance. And you shouldn’t need me to tell you how good Philip Seymour Hoffman is in just about anything he does. Perhaps the only significant fault it’s that it sidesteps any mention of oil or petroleum interests, which is, you know, not an inconsequential factor in the history of the region.

     Feed
Tags: , , , , , .

January 31st, 2008

God Damn Literary Masterpiece: Forty Signs of Rain by Kim Stanley Robinson

Posted by Madeley in Books, Politics, SF

Some years ago, when the Nineties were young and the summer days seemed to last forever (making the damned television screen that much more difficult to see) I read Robinson’s Red Mars. And I didn’t understand a word. Ever since it’s been on the list to re-read, as I expect I’d probably like it now, but it’s a bit of a doorstop and I’m already committed to eleventy-squillion other books I’ve got halfway through and am currently ignoring in the hope that we can’t be too far away from a device (an iDump, if you would) that reads stuff for you before injecting its hot sweet data payload directly into your brain.

While waiting for the revolution, I picked up Forty Signs of Rain because it’s only about 350 pages.

The book’s largely set-up, the first of a trilogy dealing with environmental change and humanity’s response to it. It’s surprisingly upbeat, in the sense that while catastrophic climate change is inevitable and we’re all intent on ignoring it, the protagonists are all scientists working in seperate fields that combined may have a way of saving society.

Which makes it all the more heartbreaking that despite this tone, all I’m taking away from the book is a feeling of futility. Robinson’s characters are the scientists we all read about in the days of Asimov, the heroes who use logic and knowledge to better our lives and provide solutions. The book points towards the creation of a scientific institution that can combine different ideas and viewpoints, but that will also carry political weight and influence.

That just isn’t going to happen in this day and age. This isn’t SF, unfortunately. It’s fucking fantasy. I hate to get all doom and gloom, but if the past few decades have shown anything it’s that science isn’t considered the way forward anymore, if it ever was. Science, logic and reason have become something to be dismissed in favour of vague notions of faith and incredibly distinct notions of corporate wealth accumulation. Robinson suggests that it’s possible to make changes now for the better. We all know that’s not going to happen.

OK, that romped off to a bit of a dark place.

Anyway, the book’s a great example of science-heavy SF done well, with likeable characters and a surprisingly touching romantic entanglement showing up unexpectedly towards the end. Sure, there’s probably a little too much Science to appeal to the general populace, but when do we ever give a shit about them? Buy this book and feed your inner lab-nerd.

     Feed
Tags: , , .

Next Page »