Avenging Whom, Exactly?
I notice that the World War 2 Marvel film is provisionally titled “The First Avenger: Captain America”, or something to that effect. I assume that it’s only a step from here to retitling it “The First Avenger”, or maybe just “Avenger”, in non-US countries.
Interesting, in a way. In an attempt to appeal to us UnAmericans the new GI JOE film involves an “international” team, something that’s irritated fans and caused some wholly irrelevant farting around from the kind of people who lost it when Perry White didn’t say “American Way” in Superman Returns. I’d be curious to know whether they honestly think the rest of the world will flock to see the film because the American paramilitary fetish has now been lightly veiled, whether we’d all go to see it even if it was all Starred and Spangly because everyone (at least, everyone with the taste in entertainment of a 10 year old) has a paramilitary fetish anyway, or even whether the rest of the world cares. The biggest mistake they may have made is that the brand just doesn’t have the mass appeal or fuzzy nostalgia of Transformers, though I concede I could be wrong about that.
I suppose my point is that, sure, considering recent actions the rest of the world isn’t inclined to get all rah-rah about the US army. And believe me, if the Eurovision Song Contest results are anything to go by, the Brits don’t have a fantastic rep either. Does it matter in terms of a Captain America film? Probably, although I don’t think the Iraq debacle has soured anyone on the fun to be had in Razi-bashing. I don’t think trying to obscure the title will make much difference to this. A title change won’t make people miss which hero is being featured in the film, and in fact a title change will just bring round a news cycle of aforementioned irrelevant farting. Maybe that’s the plan- they say any publicity’s good publicity, after all.
Superman isn’t always effected by his status as an American avatar. While the American Way stuff is an intrinsic part of his character these days, it doesn’t take much rationalising for the rest of us to be able to relate to him regardless of nationality. Captain America’s a little tougher because, well. He’s called Captain fucking America.
Is that a bad thing? Hells no. Of course not. That’s his entire raison d’être. What goes with that is the character has to carry that too, good times or bad, and tough shit if you’re the movie’s marketing guy.
On a slightly related note, not too long ago a friend of mine tried to get me to pick up the new Captain Britain comic, written by Paul Cornell, a thoroughly nice bloke and an excellent writer whether of books, comics or on the new Who. Problem was, my friend also said something along the lines of “And he’s a British superhero too- don’t you want to support that?”.
And that, there, is the heart of the problem. I have no particular animosity to the character. I’ve got no particular animosity to anyone who feels they are “British”, or to the concept of “Britain”. But that’s not how I identify myself. That’s not who I feel I am. And no, I don’t really want to support the concept of a Captain Britain (I hasten to add that’s a very subjective personal opinion, and not something I expect anyone else to subscribe to), because I already feel that the Welsh, the Scots, even the English themselves get short changed, culturally, by anything that lumps us all in together.









